Odex to Pay Legal Costs

By motd | Aug 25, 2007

After my blog entry on “Odex Beaten @ Their Own Game” I was wondering if I had a chance to read the 13 page grounds of decision by District Judge Earnest Lau - the knight in shining armour to the local anime world.

In yesterday’s copy of the free newspaper Today, the latest happenings on Odex Saga was published, District Judge Earnest Lau ruled that Odex had no right of civil action as the company was only a sub-licensee for the titles. His 13 page grounds of decision was released to the media on Friday.

Not only did District Judge Earnest Lau threw out the bid, he had ordered Odex to foot the legal costs of more than $7,000. The summary of the decision could be found on todayonline and on Zhane’s Blog

So what prompt the Judge to dismiss Odex’s bid?

  1. Odex was just a sub-licensee - not the copyright owner or exclusive licensee for most of the anime titles sold here.
  2. Judge Earnest Lau was unconvinced of the investigation method Odex used to uncover the IP addresses and pinpoint the wrongdoers.
  3. Out of the 13 letters Odex produced to claim that it was authorized to go after illegal downloaders, only three parties - all distributors themselves - had directly appointed Odex to act for them. The other 10 letters had authorized the Anti-Video Piracy Association (Singapore) to do so.
  4. In Odex letter of demand, it hinted of criminal prosecution should the downloaders refused to pay up. But under the Copyright Act,”only the copyright owner and the statutory exclusive licensee … have the right to take action against copyright infringers”.
  5. Mr Goh director of Odex had no proof that his firm had engaged the services of BayTSP and neither did BayTSP give evidence in favor of Odex.

What made my blood boil was, Odex had the exclusive license for just one title, Mobile Suit Gundam Seed. They only had the right to take action against copyright infringers for that title and not others! You can find a copy of the darn letter here in pdf format. Odex had been wielding a feather as a sword all along.

The other was that Singnet did not engage lawyers to resist Odex’s application. Some great talk about the protecting customer’s rights and privacy. Makes me wonder if Starhub engaged any lawyer to resist Odex’s application.

What makes your blood boil and blood pressure to go up in this Odex Saga?

  • The lack of transparency?
  • The arrogant Ah Sing?
  • Singnet who claim to protect it’s customer’s rights and privacy but didn’t even engage lawyers to resist Odex’s application?

6 Comments so far
  1. aelgtoer August 26, 2007 12:18 am

    Great post. This does reveal more grounds for the Judge’s decision and shows that Odex’s actions were based on much shakier foundations than previously assumed. Of particular importance is the AVPAS authorisation part (showing that Odex was not directly authorised as claimed earlier) and that Odex is just a sub-licensee.

    If so, based on the Copyright Act, it would certainly appear that a sub-licensee in contrast to an exclusive licensee and copyright owner has no right to commence a civil action for copyright infringement as was mentioned in my post on the legal aspects of Odex’s currect actions.

  2. backfire August 26, 2007 7:44 am

    Look like Odex get somehow ‘betray’ by Starhub! Odex get overconfident thinking that if a giant like Starhub will Bounce down before Odex, other ISP will do likewise. Little did they know that StarHub had somehow trap Odex unintentionally, and now Starhub can either sue Odex or Odex can vanish into thin air.

    In chinese Idiom. Hai Ren Hai Ji; Harm others end up harming himself !

  3. WishBoNe August 26, 2007 9:34 am

    After 2 “successful” lawsuits to get SingNet and Starhub to review the names of the downloaders based on the IPs, only one judge made the call that the “letter of authority” to sue the downloaders was invalid because Odex is not even allowed to get a cent from the illegal downloads.

    My, my, what was going on in the first place? Was the anti-piracy streak so strong such that the other judges did not even think about whether it was legal of Odex to do it?

  4. motd August 26, 2007 12:00 pm

    aelgtoer: The presiding Judge must be very careful on his judgement from now on as this will be a landmark case. If Odex being a sub-licensee able to win the law suit, others will most likely follow suit.

    backfire: Starhub and SingNet can’t appeal against the ruling anymore. Their loyal customers must be shaken badly by this. Especially Singnet. Lawyers are not even present during the hearing. Just how far did SingNet go to protect the rights and privacy of their customers?

    WishBone: It’s a grey area in Singapore law. On one hand they want to be good pals with the U.S.A on the other it is too expensive to bring everyone who ever downloaded copyright material to court.

  5. Mad-libs and Link Love September 3, 2007 2:36 pm

    [...] each of them was more interesting than the next. The first was Message of the Day with questions on Odex’s legal costs. The second was a heavily pregnant lady with 175cm waistline. The third was Keropokman at the [...]

  6. [...] decided to soften their approach towards local anime downloaders after District Judge Earnest Lau dismiss Odex’s bid to force Pacnet to disclose it’s customer’s [...]

Leave a Comment

If you would like to make a comment, please fill out the form below.

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Comments

If you don't see your comments immediately, that is because moderation mode is on. By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.

© 2007 motd.escrito.info, - PassionDuo WordPress Theme